|
ヘタリアなど / 居酒屋のイメージのテンプレートに変えてみました(2025/08/05) / You are in the bar. × [PR]上記の広告は3ヶ月以上新規記事投稿のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書く事で広告が消えます。 ・イスラエルまんが103からタイトルを変更しました。 forbesのニュースと、JAPAN TIMESのニュースを読みました。 Toshiba said that it has signed an MOU equity memory. The reported that the consortium honor by the end of September had been selected by Toshiba. Between Toshiba and resulted ties to rival has refused that doesn’t respect Toshiba. Requests on May 14 and July 5 this year it engaged again. Toshiba would take tireless efforts to reach a resolution that is in the best. Throughout our ongoing dialogue have been flexible. Toshiba’s beneficial needs of Toshiba in the joint venture. Buy,it aimed at group’s bidding partner,the addition are maker and data in a statement, support for an independent to prevent an independent all.
A Crowded Offer For Toshiba Memory The Toshiba memory unit saga gets more and more complicated. After failing to reach an agreement with Western Digital by the end of August, Toshiba said that it has signed an MOU to sell its memory unit to a consortium led by U.S. private equity company, Bain Capital and Korean flash memory manufacturer SK Hynix. The reported offer from this group is for about $22 B. At the same time, Toshiba indicated that it did not rule out a deal with other suitors, including Western Digital. Bain Capital said in a statement that the consortium includes Apple as well as Dell. It also includes Kingston Technology and Seagate Technology. Bain indicated that it would honor the contractual terms of the Western Digital joint venture with Toshiba. Toshiba is said that be looking to wrap up the terms of selling its chip business to the Bain consortium by the end of September. Note that the Bain consortium (without large players such as Apple and Dell) had been selected by Toshiba to take over its memory business in July, but Western Digital objected, leading to talks in August between Toshiba and Western Digital that resulted in Western Digital apologizing for strained ties after WD sued to keep the memory joint venture from being sold to rival bidders. Western Digital has asked for international arbitration of any sale with a right to refuse approval of any offer that doesn’t respect its joint venture agreement with Toshiba. It filed arbitration requests on May 14 and July 5 this year. On September 13, Western Digital issued a statement about the Toshiba decision to engage again with the Bain group.
The Western Digital statement said, “We are disappointed that Toshiba would take this action despite Western Digital’s tireless efforts to reach a resolution that is in the best interests of all stakeholders. Throughout our ongoing dialogue with Toshiba, we have been flexible, constructive and have submitted numerous proposals to specifically address Toshiba’s stated concerns. Our goal has been — and remains — to reach a mutually beneficial outcome that satisfies the needs of Toshiba and its stakeholders, and most importantly, ensures the longevity and continued success of the JVs.” WD went on to say that it was surprised that Toshiba would continue to pursue a transaction with the Bain and SK Hynix consortium without Sandisk (WD) consent. In light of the statement by Bain that it would honor Western Digital’s contractual rights in the joint venture, it remains to be seen if WD will also joint this now crowded collaboration, that includes rival Seagate Technology. The move, aimed at bolstering the group’s hand in its bidding war with Toshiba’s business partner Western Digital Corp., includes the addition of memory product maker Kingston Technology Corp. and data storage company Seagate Technology. Toshiba said this week it had agreed to step up talks with the consortium, which includes South Korean chipmaker SK Hynix Inc. It is reportedly offering ¥2.4 trillion ($22 billion) for Toshiba Memory Corp., the world’s No. 2 manufacturer of NAND memory chips. In a statement, Bain said the companies were prepared to “provide capital in a sign of industry-wide support for an independent Toshiba.” The struggling Japanese conglomerate is seeking to sell the unit to raise funds to prevent a second year of negative net worth, which would cause it to be delisted from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. But negotiations have been hampered by lawsuits filed by Western Digital claiming that Toshiba is violating the terms of their joint venture contract by seeking a buyer without its consent. Bain on Friday criticized the legal action, saying “Western Digital’s position regarding their contractual rights is over-reaching and an attempt to frustrate the legitimate efforts of Toshiba to preserve an independent Japanese Toshiba Memory company.” It added, “The newly capitalized company would continue to honor all the contractual terms of the Western Digital joint venture.” PR
・イスラエルまんが102からタイトルを変更しました。 2017/09/1515:42:06 Ultraviolet in-depth Ultraviolet opportunities, player profiles and Ultraviolet investments,Their primarily questions upon investments are mainly industry and related industries,providers of the industry's that were used to Ultraviolet industry. Global Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems Market Research Report 2017 to 2022 presents an in-depth assessment of the Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems including enabling technologies, key trends, market drivers, challenges, standardization, regulatory landscape, deployment models, operator case studies, opportunities, future roadmap, value chain, ecosystem player profiles and strategies. The report also presents forecasts for Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems investments from 2017 till 2022. This study answers several questions for stakeholders, primarily which market segments they should focus upon during the next five years to prioritize their efforts and investments. These stakeholders include Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems manufacturers such as ASML, Canon Inc., Nikon Corporation, Intel Corporation, SUSS Microtec AG, NuFlare Technology Inc., Samsung Corporation, Ultratech Inc., Vistec Semiconductor Systems, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC), etc. Primary sources are mainly industry experts from core and related industries, and suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, service providers, and organizations related to all segments of the industry’s supply chain. The bottom-up approach was used to estimate the global market size of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems based on end-use industry and region, in terms of value. With the data triangulation procedure and validation of data through primary interviews, the exact values of the overall parent market, and individual market sizes were determined and confirmed in this study.
The research provides answers to the following key questions:
This independent 103 page report guarantees you will remain better informed than your competition. With over 170 tables and figures examining the Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems market, the report gives you a visual, one-stop breakdown of the leading products, submarkets and market leader’s market revenue forecasts as well as analysis to 2022. Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), and market share and growth rate of Storage Area Network Switch in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering The report provides a basic overview of the Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. And development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures. Then, the report focuses on global major leading industry players with information such as company profiles, product picture and specifications, sales, market share and contact information. What’s more, the Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems industry development trends and marketing channels are analyzed. The research includes historic data from 2012 to 2016 and forecasts until 2022 which makes the reports an invaluable resource for industry executives, marketing, sales and product managers, consultants, analysts, and other people looking for key industry data in readily accessible documents with clearly presented tables and graphs. The report will make detailed analysis mainly on above questions and in-depth research on the development environment, market size, development trend, operation situation and future development trend of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems on the basis of stating current situation of the industry in 2017 so as to make comprehensive organization and judgment on the competition situation and development trend of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems Market and assist manufacturers and investment organization to better grasp the development course of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems Market. The study was conducted using an objective combination of primary and secondary information including inputs from key participants in the industry. The report contains a comprehensive market and vendor landscape in addition to a SWOT analysis of the key vendors. There are 15 chapters to deeply display the global Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems market. Chapter 1, to describe Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems Introduction, product scope, market overview, market opportunities, market risk, market driving force; Chapter 2, to analyze the top manufacturers of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems, with sales, revenue, and price of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems, in 2016 and 2017; Chapter 3, to display the competitive situation among the top manufacturers, with sales, revenue and market share in 2016 and 2017; Chapter 4, to show the global market by regions, with sales, revenue and market share of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems, for each region, from 2012 to 2017; Chapter 5, 6, 7,8and 9, to analyze the key regions, with sales, revenue and market share by key countries in these regions; Chapter 10and 11, to show the market by type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2012 to 2017; Chapter 12, Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2017 to 2022; Chapter 13, 14 and 15, to describe Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Systems sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, Research Findings and Conclusion, appendix and data source. 北朝鮮のミサイルの発射は諸刃の剣だということ。 The definition policy needs experts,knowledgeable nuclear Hecker. Believe he is he is Hecker. 6 U.S. still solve the entire nuclear. The troops there. In order to deter us from invading, they’ve held South Korea hostage with a million troops and massive artillery staged right on the border. And they’re constantly and identity in order to deter. They've held on the border improving their Hussein who had nuclear weapons programs. When the United States decided they were threats before him,even if you have the knowledge quite a bit the threat in the next few years before he can actually reach effective nuclear,he have not acted like we understand this. The United States has over 60 years of evidence. Level of rhetorical bluster that didn’t exist. ‘They’re responding to our threats,to provoke to avoid that we dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. The blast produced a 6.3 magnitude earthquake, ten times the size of their previous tests. The hydrogen bomb, but it was probably a hydrogen-boosted fission bomb. The hydrogen that releases a lot more high-energy neutrons. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) has ramped up both its missile and its nuclear weapons capabilities. We need to talk directly with them before they effectively couple them together. Since this is one definition of insanity, it’s no wonder our policy keeps failing. We need to wake up and do what nuclear and diplomatic experts have been trying to tell us for decades: - drop our foolish requirement of preconditions in order to even start talking with North Korea - drop our fantasy of complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea
- drop our preoccupation with their intercontinental ballistic missile program; nuclear is the real concern - assure Kim Jong Un of his regime’s security, meaning we will not seek regime change, since that is what this is all about For starters, we might want to heed the words of the world’s most knowledgeable nuclear weapons expert, Dr. Siegfried Hecker. Director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory from 1986 to 1997 and now at Stanford, Hecker is the nuclear scientist who has most visited and inspected the North Korean nuclear facilities. ‘Kim is a tyrant, but I don’t believe he is crazy or suicidal. I believe he is deterrable,’ says Hecker. ‘3 Kims and 6 U.S. Presidents later, diplomacy can still solve the North Korea crisis.’ Dr. Siegfried Hecker in the North Korean Yongbyon plutonium laboratory in August 2007. North Korea is creating a substantial nuclear arsenal and has learned the science and engineering very quickly. Ever since 1953, North Korea’s foreign policy and national identity has been obsessed with the threat of war with America. In order to deter us from invading, they’ve held South Korea hostage with a million troops and massive artillery staged right on the border. And they’re constantly improving their military capabilities, specifically to include nuclear weapons. North Korea witnessed what happened to Saddam Hussein in 2003 and Muammar Qaddafi in 2011. Both dictators had nuclear weapons programs and we convinced both to give them up. Both were subsequently toppled when the United States decided they were threats. And died ignominious deaths. Kim Jong Un, and his father before him, took those lessons to heart and concluded that the United States cannot be trusted not to invade them. The best way Kim can ensure that he doesn’t share Saddam and Muammar’s fates is to be able to hit America with a nuclear warhead. Therefore, it is insane to think North Korea will ever completely and irreversibly denuclearize. In the modern age, nothing is irreversible anyway, even if you have to start from scratch. The knowledge and technology are out there. But we can get Kim to back off quite a bit and ratchet down the threat in the next few years before he can actually reach the U.S. mainland with an effective nuclear-tipped missile. Unfortunately, we have not acted like we understand this. The United States has over 60 years of evidence that deterrence works, but instead of deterrence and containment that worked for Soviet Russia, and China under Mao Tse-Tung, we’ve abandoned reason for old fashioned sabre-rattling…with nukes. The present Administration has taken this to a new level of rhetorical bluster that didn’t exist under previous Administrations, threatening to rain ‘fire and fury’ upon North Korea if it continues to threaten the United States. ‘They’re responding to our threats, it’s tit-for-tat,’ says Dave Kang, Director of the Korean Studies Institute at the University of Southern California. ‘Our [North Korean] policies are designed precisely to provoke the outcome we’re trying to avoid.’ We’d better get serious. The latest nuclear test by Kim produced a fairly large yield of about 100 kilotons (equivalent to 100 thousand tons of TNT), more than five times the size of the Fat Man that we dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. The U.S. Geological Survey says the blast produced a 6.3 magnitude earthquake, ten times the size of their previous tests. North Korea claims it was a true fusion-type hydrogen bomb, but it was probably a hydrogen-boosted fission bomb. Which is bad enough. Fission bombs use a neutron to split uranium-235 or plutonium-239. One split produces about 3 new neutrons, that go on to split three more atoms, that produce 9 more neutrons, then split 27…81…boom! In a microsecond, trillions upon trillions of splits occur. The pressure and heat of all those pieces flying apart is extreme. However, in a normal fission bomb only a fraction of the U or Pu is split before the core explosively disassembles, stopping the reactions. Boosting uses hydrogen gas composed of the isotopes of tritium and deuterium injected into a cavity in the fission fuel. The fissioning (or splitting) of U-235 or Pu-239 causes fusion of the hydrogen that releases a lot more high-energy neutrons that fission a lot more of the U or Pu before the core disintegrates. The fusion doesn’t add much power itself, but makes the fissioning more efficient, yielding many times more power than an unboosted fission bomb. Whether North Korea’s latest bomb test was a true hydrogen fusion bomb, or a hydrogen-boosted fission bomb, it doesn’t much matter, says Hecker. Kim is creating a substantial nuclear arsenal. However, an actual hydrogen bomb would put them in the elite company of the P-5 states, the United States, Russia, China, Great Britain, and France, and would definitely increase Pyongyang’s leverage should it ever come back to the negotiating table. There are other players as well. North Korea sits between China and South Korea. China has conflicted desires - not wanting a united Korean peninsula, not wanting a nuclear DPRK, and not wanting regime change that would flood China with millions of refugees. South Korea doesn’t want to be invaded. Talking directly with Pyongyang is just the start. Just a step to determine what might be a sane future without inadvertently crossing some red line that neither of us knows exists. But we will not succeed unless we address the real issue with this regime – Kim’s survival. And we need to start talking. サウジアラビアは、日本に大変な興味を示しているそうです。 追記を書くべきか・・
United Nations Disarmament United pain against North Korea over the powerful nuclear imports oil in U.N. is up political game of nuclear that reached the North latest nuiclear bomb. The Democratic People is ready to ultimate U.S. pain in Robert Wood resolution to the regime. The international is no longer willing to put up provocative regime. The regime is loud and clear on all implement other exising. North Korea's ambassador to the United Nations Han Tae Song attends the Conference on Disarmament at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland September 5, 2017. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse GENEVA (Reuters) - North Korea on Tuesday rejected a U.N. Security Council resolution imposing tougher sanctions and said the United States would soon face the “greatest pain” it had ever experienced. The Security Council unanimously stepped up sanctions against North Korea on Monday over the country’s sixth and most powerful nuclear test, imposing a ban on its textile exports and capping imports of crude oil. “My delegation condemns in the strongest terms and categorically rejects the latest illegal and unlawful U.N. Security Council resolution,” Pyongyang’s ambassador, Han Tae Song, told the U.N.-sponsored Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. Han accused the U.S. administration of being “fired up for political, economic, and military confrontation,” and of being “obsessed with the wild game of reversing the DPRK’s development of nuclear force which has already reached the completion phase”. North Korea was condemned globally for its latest nuclear test on Sept. 3, which it said was of an advanced hydrogen bomb. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is “ready to use a form of ultimate means”, Han said without elaborating. “The forthcoming measures by DPRK will make the U.S. suffer the greatest pain it ever experienced in its history,” he said. U.S. disarmament ambassador Robert Wood took the floor to say that the Security Council resolution “frankly sent a very clear and unambiguous message to the regime that the international community is tired, is no longer willing to put up provocative behavior from this regime”. “My hope is the regime will hear the message loud and clear and it will choose a different path,” Wood said. “We call on all countries to vigorously implement these new sanctions and all other existing sanctions,” he added. Reporting by Stephanie Nebehay; Editing by John Stonestreet and Andrew Heavens Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. |
プロフィール
ＨＮ：
umineco
性別：
非公開
カテゴリー
最新記事
(01/29)
(01/29)
(01/29)
(01/28)
(01/28)
P R
|