うみねこのしま

vatican市国とエリザベス女王様のイングランド国教会が、ポツダム宣言を否定するすごい領域を湾岸に作るらしいんですよ。

キリスト教徒の国があるというのです。

信教の自由が認められるべきだそうです。

中国の政府に対しても、キリスト教徒は自分の領土を主張しています。

その場所は、かつてのドイツに倣った立憲君主国制よりも持って宗教的な法律を持つ特別エリアになる予定です。

その国は、キリスト教徒の国だそうです。肌の色の白い人しかいないそうです。英語が母語だそうです。
驚きですよ・・顔ぶれが大日本帝国の貴族・旧大名家のお坊ちゃま、お嬢ちゃまだらけ・・・・





それにしても信教の自由の名の下に、日本と中国が、なぜ彼ら敗戦国の指導者の作った法律によって支配されなければいけないのでしょうか？






天皇や、貴族は、自分達は武力によって昔から日本国の支配者（隠れキリシタン）だったのに、日本の土地を領有できないなんておかしい、と言ったんだって・・・

アメリカとロシア帝国に戦争に負けたあとは、隠れキリシタンは、洋服を作りたかったけど畑も工場を作る場所も持っていなかったんだって。








今、中国製の体温計と風邪薬を配っている人じゃないか？

普通の優秀なデジタル商品です、とかいう広告を出していた、

それから”もっと身分のあがるスタイリッシュでオシャレな中国製を身に着けよう！”と他の商品も売っていた。

インテリアー・洋服・携帯電話？





vatican市国とイングランド国教会が日本で、工場の土地を所有し、洋服と体温計と風邪薬を作りました。

信教の自由を実現するためです。

複数の条約が支配する日本国に勝手にキリスト教徒の品をみんなに配ったからといって、
”みんな敗戦国のキリスト教徒の人だよね？”

というのはおかしいです。



隠れキリシタンは、こう言いました。

”私は戦争に勝ったほうです。本当のイスラエル人、本当のキリスト教徒なのです。英語が母語で肌の色が白いのです。”


彼らは、挙句の果てにはアメリカ人が敗戦国日本に用意した品物まで持っていこうとしました。
しかしそれは本当のイスラエル人の為に用意されたものでした。





アメリカはけっして、”信教の自由”を実現するための品を日本国に配っていたわけではないのです。
アメリカはキリスト教の国で日本でも隠れキリシタンにだけ物を配っていたのです。










隠れキリシタン・キリスト教徒は国境線の敷かれた湾岸地域と、自分の洋服が欲しかった。
なぜ米軍基地の独立の時にそれが達成されなかったのか？
今こそ、正しいことが行われようとしているのです。




多くの中国人も日本人も、湾岸のキリスト教徒に関わりたいとは願っていません。

彼らが欲しかった、”中国製の洋服”・”中国製の体温計”・”中国製のインテリアー”・”中国製の携帯電話？”を今すぐに捨てて湾岸に追い出したほうがいい。

そうしなければ国土全体に保証されていた信教の自由が失われることになります。

もう、既に仏教寺院が、イスラム教のモスクが襲われ始めています。








何度も書きますが、彼らは、アメリカ人が敗戦国日本に用意した品物まで持っていこうとしました。
しかしそれは本当のイスラエル人の為に用意されたものでした。

しかし、この広大な中国や日本列島の国土はキリスト教徒の為に用意されたものではありません。

国際条約があります。

条約はキリスト教信者の昭和天皇の敗北を明文化しました。

中国政府が、香港の返還を受け入れたことはポツダム宣言を否定する権力だと考えている人もいるようですが間違っていると思います。


今、信教の自由が勝とうとしています。
イスラム教や仏教が認められようとしています。

隠れキリシタンを名乗っていた大日本帝国の天皇や貴族は、神道の教祖としてキリスト教会を裏切ることができるというのでしょうか？

国境をまたいだ2つの領土をどうやって隠れキリシタンの工場が治めるというのでしょうか？





ディズニーランドの辺りが湾岸、ホテル、クリスマス、ホイップケーキ縁取りのリボン・・

ほら～湾岸を作るのに日本列島では何の問題もないんですけど問題は、
上海のディズニーランドと香港のディズニーランドですよ。

最近上海ガニ売ってない？

ディズニーランドで中華料理だとかやってない？

逆です。

中国人が湾岸で中華料理を食べるしかないなんてありえません。



中国は何でも西洋の真似をして作ることができました。
中国が作れなかった唯一の国がイスラエルです。
もう1つのイスラエルはあります。
中国はイスラエルを作ることが出来ると思います。
フェンスの建設をすることが出来ると思います。

18 civilians killed in Syria air strikes – Assad says enemies boost support for rebels

BEIRUT: At least 18 civilians were killed and 40 wounded in “probably Russian” air strikes on a rebel-held town in northwestern Syria yesterday, a monitoring group said. The strikes hit the Idlib province town of Ariha, which is controlled by the Army of Conquest, a rebel alliance of mainly Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra Front, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said. Several areas of the town were hit and rescue operations are under way with several critically wounded, the Britain-based group said. The Army of Conquest alliance seized Ariha in May after heavy fighting with regime forces.

A longtime ally of Damascus, Moscow escalated its support to President Bashar Al-Assad on September 30 with an air campaign aimed at bolstering regime positions and backing ground operations by Syrian government troops. Moscow says it targets the Islamic State group and other “terrorists”, but critics accuse it of targeting moderate and Islamist rebel fighters more than IS. Syria’s neighbors have charged that Russian planes have strayed into their airspace on multiple occasions during the campaign.

Russia carried out heavy raids in northern Syria this week after Turkey downed one of its jets in the area. Turkey claims the warplane strayed into its airspace and ignored repeated warnings to change course, but Russia has insisted it did not cross the border. The incident has led to a sharp deterioration of relations between Ankara and its largest energy supplier. The pilot of the Russian plane was shot dead by rebels as he parachuted down after ejecting, but his navigator was rescued by Russian and Syrian special forces.

The pilot’s body is to be handed over to a Russian representative after being retrieved from Syria, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said on Sunday. A Russian warplane recently entered Israeli-controlled airspace from Syria but the intrusion was resolved without incident, Israeli Defence Minister Moshe Yaalon said yesterday. In early November, apparent Russian air strikes killed at least 11 civilians in two towns in Idlib province, the Observatory said. More than 250,000 people have been killed since the Syrian conflict erupted in 2011.

Meanwhile, Assad told a senior Iranian official yesterday that his adversaries had increased weapon supplies and financial support to insurgents since the start of a major offensive aided by his allies to regain lost territory. Assad was quoted by state media as telling Ali Akbar Velayati, a top adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, that the military support his country was getting from Iran and Russia had pushed the enemy states he did not name to “further escalate and increase financing and equipping of terrorists”.

The Syrian army said on Saturday that Turkey had increased supplies of weapons, ammunition and equipment to what it described as terrorists in Syria. The senior Iranian official was quoted as saying that his country would continue to support Syria as the war “against terror was a decisive one for the region and the world”. Assad said the defeat of rebel groups fighting to topple his rule was a prerequisite for the “success of any political solution decided by Syrians”.

A Syrian military source told Reuters last week rebels were making heavy use of US-made anti-tank missiles paid for by Saudi Arabia and supplied via Turkey and the weapons were having an impact on the battlefield. The so-called TOW missile is the most potent weapon in the arsenal of rebel groups and has been seen in action more frequently since Russia intervened with air strikes on Syria on Sept 30. – Agencies

http://news.kuwaittimes.net/website/18-civilians-killed-in-syria-air-strikes/



What is the substitute of the carpet in Kuwait?

rebels

probably air strikes

air strikes on a rebel-held town in northwestern Syria yesterday

strikes hit the Idlib is controlled by the Army of Conquest,

rescue

The Army of Conquest

Damascus

campaign

regime

ground operations

government troops

targets

terrorists

neighbors have charged

carried out heavy raids

relations

claims repeated warnings to change course,

It did not cross

Rebels were rescued by special force

Recently civilians in two towns in Idlib to regain lost territory.

Country continues to the region of rebel Saudi Arabia so-called TOW missile in the rebel on Sept

これが、台湾のスターJay Chou周 杰倫とかシンガポールから来たJJ林俊傑と同じ民族のアメリカ人か～

この方はヨーロッパ人とみまごうばかりの容姿ですが、れっきとしたユダヤ人なのね・・・

名前を漢字に変えてどうするつもり？

テレビのスター？

いい加減にして欲しいわよ。

何でスターの身分を認めてやらないと習近平様が中国のテレビに出演できないの？

ありえなくない？

れっきとしたアメリカ人になんで漢字の名前を与えてやらないといけないの？

その上金持ちにしてやってウェディングドレスが何億円だの、子供が生まれて、普通の中国人とは違う豪華生活を送っているんだとか、おまえら中国人とは吸ってる空気が違うとか、自慢を聞いてやるわけ？

店の週刊誌や新聞に写真が出てると不愉快だけど”言論の自由だ”とか言って自分で芸能雑誌や新聞を印刷しているんでしょう？

怖いわ～中国には、共産党では捕まえられない活動家がいるのよ。





Army General John Campbell looked stricken Thanksgiving Eve as he detailed how U.S. troops blasted away at an Afghan hospital last month, killing 30. His grim visage made clear that he’d rather have been any place in the world other than that podium in Kabul. Unfortunately, he wasn’t the first American commander to face second-guessing spotlights, highlighting in hindsight what now seems so obvious: how could such a snafu have happened?
The Oct. 3 attack on the Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders in English) hospital in the northern Afghan city of Kunduz has disturbing echoes of two other mistaken attacks by the U.S. military: the 1988 shoot down of Iran Air 655, killing 290 innocent civilians over the Persian Gulf, and the 1994 destruction of a pair of U.S. UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters over northern Iraq, killing 26, including 15 Americans.
None of these occurred amid the so-called “fog of war.” Each happened in what might be called the “haze of war,” where one additional check, carried out correctly, should have averted catastrophe. To be sure, each mistake in that trio of tragedies had unique elements that make them risky to lump together. But they also share a similarity that needs to be acknowledged to reduce the chance of another one happening again. The hardware designed to kill performed flawlessly. It was the judgment of those pulling the trigger that was flawed.
The USS Vincennes shot down the Iranian airliner 14 months after the Iraqi air force attacked the USS Stark in the Persian Gulf, killing 37 sailors. That put commanders in the Gulf on edge. After a skirmish with a pair of Iranian gunboats, the Vincennes crew said they feared the airplane approaching their vessel on July 3, 1988, was an Iranian F-14 fighter, and not an Airbus A-300. Five sailors sitting at five screens said they witnessed the Airbus descending toward their ship, as if on an attack mission. So at 10:24 a.m. on July 3, 1988, the Vincennes fired a pair of Standard surface-to-air missiles at the approaching aircraft. One hit the plane, destroying it.
Data recorded during the shoot down showed the plane was climbing the entire time, after taking off from the Iranian airport at Bandar Abbas seven minutes earlier. It was on a routinely scheduled 28-minute flight across the gulf for the international airport at Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
The official investigation concluded that “the data from USS Vincennes tapes … corroborate the fact that [Iran Air Flight 655] was on a normal commercial air flight plan profile, in the assigned airway, squawking Mode III 6760, on a continuous ascent in altitude from take-off at Bandar Abbas to shoot-down.” In other words, the Vincennes‘ crew overlooked or disregarded signs that the plane approaching their ship was not an F-14 fighter. The Navy’s official probe said the five sailors who thought their ship was under attack were engaging in “scenario fulfillment” caused by “an unconscious attempt to make available evidence fit a preconceived scenario.”
“How information is processed (and by whom) is at the heart of the problem,” Navy Commander David Carlson, skipper of the U.S. Navy warship closest to the Vincennes, said a year after the shootdown. “View it as you will, Iran Air Flight 655 was shot down for no good reason.”
Six years later, on April 14, 1994, a pair of F-15 fighters shot down two U.S. Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters, believing them to be Iraqi aircraft violating the U.S.-imposed no-flight zone over the northern part of the country. Once again, a string of errors led to the tragedy. Unlike the Iran shoot down, these choppers—regardless of their nationality—posed no threat to the F-15s. The pilots’ decision to impose capital punishment on all aboard suggests they knew what they were shooting at. But they did not: while the two F-15 pilots said they thought they were targeting Soviet-built Mi-24 Hind helicopter gunships, they shot down a pair of Black Hawks, complete with U.S. flags painted on their sides. They were too far away, and flying too fast, to identify the aircraft they ended up destroying.
Beyond the initial misidentification, the crew aboard a nearby AWACS command-and-control plane failed to intervene. The identification-friend-or-foe electronics that should have told the F-15 pilots that the UH-60s were friendlies also didn’t work. And the poor integration of the Army choppers into the Air Force’s no-fly-zone operations doomed those aboard the choppers.
Air Force officials said “the tactical environment did not warrant a rush to judgment,” a 1997 General Accounting Office report
said
. “…The F-15 pilots had acted too hastily and should have asked more questions…the pilots had an unnecessarily aggressive attitude toward the intercept and shootdown.”
Part of the rush to judgment, the Air Force found, was that a pair of F-16 fighters would soon arrive in the area the F-15s were patrolling. U.S. military officials overseeing the Pentagon’s operations over northern Iraq “acknowledged that a rivalry existed between the F-15 and F-16 communities,” the GAO report said. “At the time of the shootdown the rivalry had become more pronounced and intense.”
Wait a minute—weren’t these pilots on the same side? “The Combined Task Force Commander attributed this atmosphere to the F-16 community’s having executed the only fighter shootdown in Operation Provide Comfort and all shootdowns in Bosnia,” the GAO found. Waiting for the F-16s’ arrival would slow down—perhaps halt—the F-15s’ attack, “ruining the pilots’ chances for a shootdown.”
Likewise, the Oct. 3 attack on the hospital by an Air Force AC-130 gunship happened only after a string of errors. Some of them, according to Campbell, included:
— The aircraft launched without conducting a normal mission brief or securing crucial mission essential related materials, including the no-strike designations which would have identified the location of the MSF trauma center.
— During the flight, the electronic systems onboard the aircraft malfunctioned, preventing the operation of an essential command and control capability and eliminating the ability of aircraft to transmit video, send and receive e-mail or send and receive electronic messages.
— When the aircrew entered the coordinates into their fire-control systems, the coordinates correlated to an open field over 300 meters from the NDS [National Director of Security building, where Taliban fighters had been battling Afghan forces for five days] headquarters…This mistake happened because the aircraft was several miles beyond its normal orbit and its sensors were degraded at that distance.
— The aircrew visually located the closest, largest building near the open field, which we now know was the MSF trauma center.
— The aircrew concluded, based on the [U.S. Special Operation’s target spotter’s] description of a large building near a field, that the MSF trauma center was the NDS headquarters.
—One minute prior to firing, the aircrew transmitted to their operational headquarters at Bagram Airfield that they were about to engage the building. They provided the coordinates for the MSF Trauma Center as their target. The headquarters was aware of the coordinates for the MSF Trauma Center and had access to the no-strike list, but did not realize that the grid coordinates for the target matched a location on the no-strike list or that the aircrew was preparing to fire on the hospital.
What all three tragedies share is what motorists call “driving beyond your headlights”—going so fast at night that you don’t have time to stop if your headlights reveal something blocking the road ahead. These military accidents suffered from the same shortsightedness. Basically, the U.S. military’s firepower is so good—so lethal—that it must be used carefully, especially when there is no imminent threat to allied forces. And an “imminent threat”—as Iran Air 655 shows—can be in the eye of the beholder.
In each case, technology that should have applied brakes to the deadly decision wasn’t working properly, or wasn’t interpreted properly by those involved. Each time, a human made the initial wrong decision that culminated in disaster.
There is no known technology to prevent that.

http://time.com/4128715/afghanistan-hospital-kunduz-military/



ドバイのエミレーツ航空とイギリスの関わりがわからないけど、国境なき医師団と、ドバイに入ると、あんな弱そうな裸同然のアメリカ移民の存在が消えてやたら大きな軍隊になって出てくるのよねぇ・・・？

the Vincennes‘ crew？


どういうことなの？

湾岸？


原住民を追い払おうとしているわよ、原住民ってイランのことかしら？


Away

Visage made any place in the world.

It wasn’t the first American to face second-guessing spotlights.
What now seems so obvious without Borders in English of other mistaken over the Persian Gulf.

Unique to kill performed that was flawed.

USS
USS

with a pair of Iranian

The plane was taking off from the Iranian airport international airport at Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

USS was on airway

In other words, the Vincennes‘ crew

Information is processed at the problem.

U.S.
U.S.
U.S. is unlike the Iran.



以下省略。

American Airlines stops taking payment in Argentine currency
FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) -- American Airlines says it has stopped taking Argentine pesos as payment for tickets because of limits on its ability to convert the money into dollars.

Airline spokeswoman Martha Thomas said Wednesday that American would try to resolve the issue with the new government of President-elect Mauricio Macri.

American is continuing to operate 27 flights per week between the U.S. and Buenos Aires, more than any other airline, Thomas said. However, customers in Argentina must use foreign credit cards or dollars or other foreign currencies to buy tickets from American.

Under outgoing President Cristina Fernandez, Argentina responded to a shortage of foreign-currency reserves by sharply limiting the amount of dollars that companies could transfer out of the country.

On Sunday, Macri defeated Fernandez's favored candidate and will take office on Dec. 10. He campaigned on promises to revive Argentina's weak economy with free-market policies including the removal of currency controls.

The Argentina dispute is similar to one between Venezuela and foreign airlines. An airline-industry trade group said in June that foreign carriers had $3.7 billion in ticket revenue trapped in Venezuela because of currency controls. Fort Worth-based American, the world's largest airline, eliminated many flights to Venezuela last year because of the standoff.

American flies to Buenos Aires from New York, Miami and Dallas-Fort Worth.

http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20151126p2g00m0bu023000c.html

アメリカの本質というのは移民の貧しい懐に頼った政府だということだ。

テレビで意見を言っている貧しい人を助けてあげなければいけませんよね？

というのがアメリカ政府の本質だ。

”あの偉そうな人誰？”

”あのやたら貧しい人誰？”と思ってませんか？

あれが皆さんが憧れているアメリカ政府の人の姿です。

アメリカ政府はれっきとした政府ですから意見があります。

TV討論会で民意という財布から金と慈愛と哀れみとを引き出すのです。

それが政治家の役割です。

そんなアメリカがどうして太平洋戦争で勝つことが出来たのでしょうか？

”あの偉そうな人誰？”

”あのやたら貧しい人誰？”と思ってませんか？

あれが皆さんが憧れているアメリカ政府の人の姿です。

TV討論会では流行の強要あるブランドスーツに身を包んだどこからどう見ても信用の置けそうな高学歴のアメリカ人のコメンテーターがこう言っています。

”今お金がないんです。お金がないだけなんです。だれかに泥棒されたんだと思います。”

アメリカの多くの民意はこういいます。

”多分インディアンと日本人が悪いんだわ！

今日テレビを見ている人がお金持ちの白人でないのはおかしいです！

インディアンにテレビを買ってもらって譲ってもらわなくっちゃ！

私肌の色が白いのにテレビがないなんて大変だわ！

戦争で勝ちました！

大陸の金も天然資源も全部戦争で勝ち取りました！

私本当のアメリカ人で戦争に勝ったのに誰かがアメリカの物を泥棒しました！

私はアメリカ軍の軍人（かその妻・家族）なんですよぉ！！！！！偉いの！私の肌の色見て偉いの！

私が本当のアメリカ人です！私が勝ったんだから私の財布です！

何よアンタ原住民？英語も読めないの？

英語も読めないなんて人間じゃないね！犬だ！犬じゃなかったら豚か牛じゃありませんか？あんな言葉は聞いたことがないよ！”

アメリカ政府ってこんな感じかな？
移民にだけ優しいおかしい政府。
NewYork?

なんでテキサスからNewYork?

テキサスの間違いでしょ？ダラスだっけ？


The pesos of limits( into dollars)

The issue is (to operate 27 flights )per week must use (foreign credit cards).

The amount of promises policies (including industry trade  group the world's largest airline).

Egypt's Sisi appoints Mubarak-era minister head of the Suez Canal's economic zone

Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi appointed on Saturday former minister Ahmed Darwish the head of the Suez Canal Economic Zone Authority for a three-year term, as he launched what has been dubbed as a mega development project east of Port Said.

Darwish, 56, served as minister of administrative development in the last seven years of former president Hosni Mubarak's rule, and was in cabinet when Mubarak and his government were removed during the 2011 uprising.

Since 2011, he served as an international consultant across a wide variety of fields, advising on policies, strategies, governance, business processes and information technology, according to his website.

The development project east of Port Said includes the construction of a large seaport, an industrial area that can host 20 factories, a logistics hub and a residential area with 50,000 housing units.

The project is also slated to include a fish farm and tunnels below the Suez Canal.

The plans are part of a wider project, which Sisi launched in 2014, aiming to create a comprehensive global business centre out of the strategic Suez Canal and its surrounding area by providing maritime transport services.

At the launch event on Saturday El-Sisi said "we would never announce a project unless all its plans have been completed."

Initially the project was going to take three years to complete, but in a request aired live on television, El-Sisi gave directives to the armed forces' engineering authority to complete it in only two years.

In August, El-Sisi inaugurated what was dubbed the "new Suez Canal," a project involving deepening parts of the 193-kilometre waterway and building a parallel one along a 35-kilometre stretch of the canal, allowing the movement of ships in both directions.

Its delivery date was also cut short from three years to one year upon El-Sisi's orders and funded by savings certificates offering 12 percent interest through which the government collected EGP 64 billion in only eight days.

Many Egyptians believed it was their patriotic duty to help fund the project.

The Suez Canal development plans are long term and will take years to complete over two phases, the first of which is due by 2030, while the second is set to be completed by 2045.

In his speech on Saturday, El-Sisi praised the speed at which the development is moving. He said developing the Suez Canal area was a "dream" in 2002 and for 13 years, "little" was achieved.

"It could have taken 10 to 15 years," he said, "We have accomplished in two years what cannot be achieved in 10."

"We are defying the challenge itself," El-Sisi went on, saying that there are many other infrastructure projects underway simultaneously, including "more than one or two or three airports... but I won't say anymore [for fear of] evil and those who perpetrate it." 

http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/3/12/172096/Business/Economy/Egypts-Sisi-appoints-Mubarakera-minister-head-of-t.aspx



エジプトは騙された。
エジプトはある工業化を信じて騙された被害者だ。と書いてある。

このうえ何の政治があるというのでしょうか？
大統領選？ありえません。

エジプトの民意を倒してエジプトの大統領になろうとするものはもはやエジプトの大統領ではありえない。
外人だ。
外国に侵略されたんだ。
外人の大統領がカイロに大統領府を構えるなんてありえない。


Head of the mega development project

In the last seven years Mubarak's rule was his government.
He served on policies an industrial area that can host 20 factories, a logistics hub and a residential area with 50,000 housing units.
Plans have been engineering the movement.
The government collected EGP 64 billion in only eight days.
Many Egyptians believed it was their patriotic duty to help fund the project.

To take over phase,he said developing "little" have projects more than one or two or three and those who perpetrate it.