うみねこのしま

エリザベス女王は勘違いしてるけど日本人はオーストラリアに旅行に行きません。

中国人か韓国人じゃない？

それか大本命大清帝国のモンゴル人かもね。


今日も、イタリアンレストランのメニューの話から書こうと思ったのですが、偶然すごい写真を見つけたので、

今日はその写真から紹介します。




では、安倍首相ご自慢の日本人の写真です～

湾岸の人は、上陸するとすぐに性行為を現地人に強要する傾向がある。

安倍首相の日本国もその例にもれず、南米コロンビアに住んでいるそうです。


日本政府と話をしているつもりがいつも間にかコロンビア政府が出てくるよ。

だって安倍首相は日本人じゃないんだもん・・・

エリザベス女王は、結果を見てみたら、
あるイスラム過激派組織のリーダーにガーター勲章を授与していた。

日本国とは、ジョージ6世の時代からの長い付き合いの地域、しかし数百年を経ても彼はイスラム教過激派組織を辞めなかった。

ジョージ6世は昭和天皇を自分の王子のように可愛がってくれたそうです、しかしなつかなかった。

彼は、今日はイギリスの服を着て好き勝手なことをしているそうです。




それに引き換え、今度勲章を授与されたロシア人の方は、イギリスに貢献してくれるいい人みたいです。

英語も話してくれるし、犯罪対策もしてくれるんですって・・・

ロシア帝国から亡命されたのかもしれませんね。もう帰るところがない人は”ロシア”とは言わないのかもしれません。

それから韓国焼き肉にブラジリアン料理の牛肉のステーキなら食べるのよねぇ・・・

あの日本の子って、食のえり好みが激しいって言うの？

出前のほこりかぶった寿司が、町に出回っている高級品なんですって。


アメリカの店には日本の子はあまり興味がないらしいのよ。


”身分が下がると困るから一応マクドナルドも置いといてくれる？”

っていう感じでしょう？


”何その店また私に隠れて身分上げようとして許せないわ！”


その上、オックスフォード大学に留学させてやったりエリザベス女王って性格が優しすぎるわ。

皇太子はケンブリッジだけど、ケンブリッジと同じくらいノーブルなのはやっぱり血筋とか言ってるらしいのよね・・・

何なの日本の国王の言っている血筋って・・・

気が付くと、中国の食文化を外人に押し付けてしまうのが血筋？

King Charles? Majority of Australians support a republic instead of Queen Elizabeth's successor

James Massola

•Turnbull and Charles? PMs past provide the real awkward moments
Well, this is awkward.

Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, had just landed in Australia for his 15th visit, where they have been feted by crowds while sampling the fine local wines, cheeses and seafood at South Australia's Barossa Valley, before attending Remembrance Day ceremonies in Canberra.

It was all going so well.

But a new poll released by the Australian Republican Movement carries a blunt message from Australian voters: 51 per cent would prefer an Australian head of state to "King Charles" when the time comes for him to replace his mother, Queen Elizabeth.

The poll of 1008 voters, commissioned by the ARM and conducted by Essential Research from November 5 to 8, asked "When Prince Charles becomes King of Australia, will you support or oppose replacing the British monarch with an Australian citizen as Australia's head of state?"

Just 27 per cent of voters opposed replacing King Charles with an Australian head of state, while 22 per cent of people were undecided.

Perhaps more significantly, 50 per cent of Coalition voters - who typically are less likely to back a Republic, supported constitutional change, with 34 per cent opposed to it.

Among Labor voters, 62 per cent supported change when Charles becomes king and 21 per cent oppose it, while for Greens voters, 57 per cent support change and 17 per cent oppose it.

As Charles and Camilla arrived in Canberra on Wednesday, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull brushed aside questions about whether he believed - as he has previously argued - that Australians would struggle to accept Prince Charles as King of Australia one day.

"If the Queen's reign comes to an end and the constitution is in the form it is today, Prince Charles will become our head of state ... so if Charles become the King of the United Kingdom as I have no doubt he will be, unless our constitution has been changed, he will become the King of Australia," he said.

And the prospect of such constitutional change?

"The opportunities for constitutional change are somewhat more challenging than the opportunities for strong economic growth."

Republican support 'widespread'

ARM chairman Peter FitzSimons said that while the movement welcomed Charles and Camilla to Australia, "We look forward to the day when members of the royal family make the trip as our equals and not Australia's current and future rulers".

"This polling makes it abundantly clear, the question of an Australian republic is not a left/right issue: support exists across the Australian community, and the Republican Movement hasn't even really started campaigning yet," he said.

"As our future King and his wife touch down for their five-day tour, the Australian people are getting behind the idea of an Australian head of state in a big way. And that support is only going to increase, especially if Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull makes it a priority as we hope and expect he will."

Mr Fitzsimons said he had spoken to Mr Turnbull about the republic since the change of leadership and had been left in no doubt the Prime Minister's passion for the change was undimmed.

"But he said it has to be a people's movement and it does need to be, wide and broad," he said.

Expressions of support had also come from Liberal ministers including Christopher Pyne, Marise Payne and Wyatt Roy, Mr FitzSimons said, and membership had grown by 131 per cent since he took over in July.

A generation after defeat at the 1999 referendum, republicans have targeted a plebiscite by 2020 followed by a referendum proposing a specific republican model by 2025.

Why wait?

Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Greens leader Richard Di Natale both support, like Mr Turnbull, an Australian republic with the Labor leader promising to make it happen within a decade.

In an opinion piece for Fairfax Media, Mr Shorten argued on Wednesday that "both Malcolm Turnbull and I both support a republic, so why wait?"

In recent years, support for a republic has slipped in public polling, at least in part because of Queen Elizabeth's enduring popularity.

A February 2014 poll, for example, found that support for a republic had slipped to a 20-year low, with just 39.4 per cent of Australians backing the move, 41.6 per cent opposing it and 19 per cent expressing no opinion on the issue.

The poll findings come less than two weeks after Mr Turnbull, an avowed republican who led the "yes" campaign for a republic in 1999, dumped former prime minister Tony Abbott's hugely controversial decision to re-introduce knights and dames.

As far back as January 31, 1988, Mr Turnbull wrote in Britain's Sunday Times newspaper that an "Australian Republic must await the end of her [Queen Elizabeth's] reign" - but that "if her son wishes to do something of significance in Australia's history, he should make it plain that, whatever the Australians may think, he will not be our King".

It is unclear if Mr Turnbull and Prince Charles will discuss this suggestion when they meet on Wednesday.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/king-charles-majority-of-australians-support-a-republic-instead-of-queen-elizabeths-successor-20151110-gkvwqy.html






チャールズ皇太子と、カミラ夫人夫妻が、オーストラリアをご訪問されたそうです。
新聞の名前からして・・・また映画でも作るのかな・・・？

<ニュース1>
This had just landed where they have been feted by crowds　 the Australian Movement carries a blunt message.

Head of state replaced his mother.

Australian head of state,will become our head of state ... has been changed and had been left.

Australians may think.

<ニュース2>

Well, Cornwall where do they have fine local wines.

Well.Essential Research from November 5 to 8, asked "When Prince Charles becomes King of Australia, will you support or oppose replacing the British monarch with an Australian citizen as Australia's head of state?"

Likely on Wednesday it will will be welcomed Charles and Camilla to Australia.

Royal current issue " yet," he said.

His wife's way support is Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's expection.

Change was support that likes Mr Turnbull, an Australian republic.

Piece for in recent years with just 39.4 per cent of Australians backing the move, 41.6 per cent opposing it ,two weeks led the "yes" campaign.

Mr Turnbull wrote Times news that plains it may think Prince.

アメリカは、エリザベス女王から、
”日本人の正田美智子さんとか、ハーバード大学卒業の小和田雅子さんを使いなさい”と、もらったんだよ。


アメリカはリトを使いたかったんだよな。
それで、自らアルカイダを雇ったんじゃないか？


大騒ぎをした挙句にテロの後、アメリカ合衆国の国内で街が崩壊するような事件はひとつもないんだ。

ジョージブッシュは犯罪者だ。

狼少年って奴かもしれないな。

”困った顔して助けてくれって近づいてきたんだよ、でも誰も助けるわけないだろう？”

誰ブッシュってしつこい・・・

http://www.geocities.jp/himaruya/sw.htm



つまらない芝居だよな～小和田雅子さんはアメリカ人なんだよ。
エリザベス女王は、小和田雅子さんと高みの見物だろうな。

何なんだよ吹上御所って。唯一の宮殿？
ケンジントン宮殿にまた権力者を住まわせてやったり・・・バッキンガム宮殿は政治の場としては必要ないならベッカム夫妻を住まわせたっていいんだよな。

エリザベス女王って吹上御所に住んでるの？
”宮殿は要らない”って言ったらしいじゃん・・・・・